Defenses to Violation of Injunction
There are multiple defenses available to contest a Florida injunction violation charge. The more common defenses include:
Lack of Intent to Violate
In order to constitute a violation of an injunction in Florida, the prosecution must prove that the defendant willfully violated the injunction. To be “willful,” the defendant’s actions in violating the court’s order (as contained in the injunction) must be done “knowingly, intentionally, and purposely.” Often, the defendant was not aware of the full scope of the injunction’s prohibitions, or believed that his or her actions were in compliance with the injunction. If the violation was not willful, this can serve as a complete defense to the charge.
Lack of Notice of Injunction
The notice of an injunction is an essential element of the charge of violating its provisions. Cordova v. State, 675 So. 2d 632, 634 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 3d Dist. 1996); Thus, a conviction cannot be sustained and a Motion for Judgment of Acquittal must be granted where the State fails to prove that the defendant was served with the injunction or had some other notice. See Robinson v. State, 840 So. 2d 1138, 1139 (Fla. 1st DCA 2003) (reversing trial court’s denial of defendant’s Motion for Judgment of Acquittal where the State failed to establish that the accused knew the permanent injunction had been entered against him, either through proof that the accused had been served with the permanent injunction, or through proof that the accused had some other notice);